Category Archives: Politics

The Bureau of Land Management has a backlog of more than 200 proposed solar projects, some of which have been waiting several years

 STEPHEN POWER

President Barack Obama wants to boost the nation’s production of energy from the sun as part of an effort to double renewable power generation in three years. Among the obstacles to Mr. Obama’s agenda: the imperiled Devil’s Hole pupfish.

Patrick Putnam is a field manager for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management in southern Nevada. His job is to help the government decide whether the dozens of solar-energy projects that companies have proposed building on federal land in his jurisdiction pose undue environmental risks.

After reviewing some applications for as long as 18 months, Mr. Putnam’s office hasn’t approved any. He says his office hopes to make decisions on at least three by the end of 2010, but that will be “a monumental task.”

Across the West, companies that want to build renewable energy projects are rushing to stake claims on public land, hoping to grab federal subsidies and take advantage of state mandates that require utilities to obtain more power from renewable sources. The surge is straining the Bureau of Land Management, which is more accustomed to processing permit requests from oil and natural gas companies.

The logjam highlights a dilemma for the Obama administration: how to speed the transition to a clean-energy economy — a shift the president has promised will create millions of jobs — without trampling the legacy of a previous generation of conservationists, who left in place federal laws and regulations designed to control exploitation of federal lands or protect the habitats of endangered species.

Many of the projects that the government is considering allowing on public land use a system known as concentrating solar power. These systems often require large amounts of water to cool the turbines that are used to convert the sun’s heat into electricity. Because water is scarce in many parts of the Southwest, some land managers have questioned their suitability. Most of southern Nevada’s valleys, for example, receive only four to six inches of rainfall a year.

Complicating matters, some of the proposed projects are in southwest Nevada’s Amargosa Valley, a basin near Las Vegas that is home to the endangered Devil’s Hole pupfish. The one-inch-long, iridescent blue creature was the subject of a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that restricted how much water nearby farms could pump out of the ground. The pumping lowered water levels in the pools where the pupfish lived, shrinking the species’ numbers.

Mr. Putnam’s agency is obligated to worry about whether using water for solar-power systems could lead to more pressure on the pupfish. “This renewable energy push is so new and has come about so quickly, and in fairly large numbers, we’re trying to figure out the best process” for vetting projects, Mr. Putnam says.

The Bureau of Land Management, a unit of the Interior Department that manages 256 million acres of federal land, has a backlog of more than 200 proposed solar projects, some of which have been waiting several years.

Many solar developers fear the agency won’t approve their projects in time for them to qualify for federal aid. Under the economic-stimulus bill passed by Congress in February, solar companies must begin construction by the end of next year to qualify for grants from the Treasury Department valued at up to $2.5 billion.

Among those waiting on the BLM is Solar Millennium AG. Since October 2007, the Germany-based company has had an application before the bureau to build a $1 billion solar plant in the Amargosa Valley.

“We’re a bit nervous,” Rainer Aringhoff, president of Solar Millennium’s U.S. subsidiary. To begin construction by December 2010, he says, the BLM would have to complete an environmental review of the project by the third quarter of next year. Mr. Putnam says the BLM can’t commit to a firm date for completing a review.

Mr. Obama’s Interior Secretary, Ken Salazar, has called the BLM’s backlog “not acceptable” and announced his department will create four renewable energy coordination offices to accelerate the permitting of renewable energy projects on federal land.

The Interior Department estimates that public lands in the western U.S. could generate 206 gigawatts of wind energy and 2,900 gigawatts of solar energy — collectively about three times current U.S. electricity generating capacity, according to the Electric Power Research Institute, a nonprofit in Palo Alto, Calif.

But some lawmakers don’t want Mr. Salazar to go too fast. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.), who controls Mr. Salazar’s budget as chairwoman of a Senate appropriations panel, said at a recent hearing that such projects should be approved “in moderation,” and expressed concern that some could leave “a huge mark on land that we’re trying to conserve.”

Source: Wall Street Journal

 

Candidates for the Board of the First multi-national Task Force for 100% Renewable Energy?

 www.OilAway.org,

The Board will be established at the Energy Summit in 2010: http://www.energysummit2010.com/

  [The Apollo/Manhattan Clean Energy project was first announced by Amnon Samid at the Eilot International Renewable Energy Conference in Feb 2009] 

Martin Hoffert‏
Department of Physics, New York University
Ken Caldeira
Carnegie Institution / Stanford University
John Katzenberger
Aspen Global Change Institute
David Archer
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago
Maurice Averner
Ames Research Center, NASA
Scott Barrett
School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
Gregory Benford
Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine
Baruch Blumberg (Nobel laureate)
Fox Chase Cancer Center / University of Pennsylvania
Paul Crutzen (Nobel laureate)
University of California (San Diego) / Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
William Fulkerson
Institute for a Secure and Sustainable Environment, University of Tennessee
Christopher Green
Department of Economics, McGill University
Susan Hassol
Climate Communication
Eric Hoffert
Versatility Inc.
Thomas Homer-Dixon
Trudeau Center for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Toronto
Feng Hsu
Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA
Mark Jacobson
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University
David Keith
Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy, University of Calgary
Geoffrey Landis
Glenn Research Center, NASA
Jane C. S. Long
hydrogeologist and geotechnical engineer
Michael MacCracken
Climate Institute, Washington, DC
John C. Mankins
Sunsat Energy Council / Managed Energy Technologies
Michael E. Mann
Earth System Science Center, Pennsylvania State University
Gregg Marland
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Mark Nelson
Institute of Ecotechnics, Santa Fe, NM
Darel Preble
Space Solar Power Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology
Gregory H. Rau
Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz
Steve Rayner
Said Business School, Oxford, UK
Kim Stanley Robinson
Author, “Forty Signs of Rain”
Gregory Dennis Sachs
Alternative Power Program, US Merchant Marine Academy
Thomas Schelling (Nobel laureate)
Department of Economics, University of Maryland
Michael Schlesinger
Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Steven E. Schwartz
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Department of Energy
John Turner
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Department of Energy
Tyler Volk
Department of Biology, New York University
Tom M. L. Wigley
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Steven C. Wofsy
School of Engineering and Applied Science / Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Harvard University
Lowell Wood
Hoover Institution / Stanford University

Dear ______,

Dear Member of Congress,

We the undersigned urge you to accelerate our transition to a clean energy economy with the ambition of an Apollo or Manhattan program, by dramatically increasing America’s investment in innovative new energy technologies and systems.

A wide range of policies aimed at increasing conservation, efficiency, and reducing emissions is vital, but carbon prices and regulations alone will not create new, clean and affordable energy systems soon enough or at the scale needed.

America should be ramping up to invest a minimum of $30 billion per year to develop, demonstrate, and stimulate the commercialization of a range of technologies and approaches that can provide affordable carbon-neutral energy and use that energy more wisely. This is less than half of what America already invests in military research and development.

The United States is in a unique position to take the lead in this research and development effort, but we must work with others. The world, including China, India and other developing nations, needs affordable clean technologies now to avoid the lock-in of massive carbon emissions from conventional coal plants.

Energy sources available today cannot provide enough power to drive economic growth without damaging our climate system. We cannot predict with confidence which energy technologies will win in a future marketplace. For this reason, we need a diverse and strategically selected portfolio of investments. Potential solutions need to be explored and tested with hardware. Because the taxpayer dollar should be invested wisely, a relatively open process should be established that will select and support research and development projects based on technical merits.

Public investment in clean energy will more than pay for itself, just as did the U.S. government investment in computer science and aerospace during the 1950s and ’60s. Much of our economic growth since World War II resulted from technological developments that were accelerated and incubated by public investment – the Internet being only one example. Particularly critical are technologies that can be commercialized in five to twenty-five years — too long for venture capital, too short for basic research. Private firms are not making — and cannot be expected to make – the necessary level of long-term investments in energy and energy infrastructure research and development.

The major problems confronting the nation and world require clean, secure, and affordable energy.

Sustained public investment now in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies will reduce climate risk, increase energy security, revitalize education, enhance our competitiveness, and strengthen the American economy.

Sincerely*,

 

Moving U.S. from carbon energy to clean power

Michael Honda,Amy Smart

 The American Clean Energy and Security Act begins to lay the groundwork for a future powered by the wind and sun. America needs this bill to maximize job creation, invest in the skills of our workers and the long-term economic prosperity of our country, and significantly reduce the pollution that has been caused by fossil fuel industries for decades.

University of Massachusetts economists estimate that investing $100 billion in clean energy and green infrastructure over two years would generate 235,198 jobs here in California. Between the $80 billion in the president’s economic recovery plan and funding in his budget, we’re on track to do even more.

To deliver on the promise that clean energy holds to transform our economy, the House of Representatives should strengthen the act in these ways:

– Increase the clean energy standards to 30 percent by 2020, combine renewable energy and energy efficiency to deliver more clean energy jobs to the U.S. economy more quickly.

– Restore authority to the EPA to regulate carbon emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act.

– Reduce incentives to polluting industries to supplement programs that create green jobs and train workers to fill them.

There may be efforts to roll back the target for reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 2020. The bill’s science-based standards aim to reduce U.S. global warming pollution by 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and achieve an additional 10 percent reduction through agreements to prevent tropical deforestation, for a total reduction of 27 percent by 2020. By 2050, the bill would reduce emissions by 83 percent. We are urging Congress to oppose any effort to weaken the pollution reduction targets.

Congress needs to hear from people who are ready to repower America – to move away from the polluting energy sources of the past and toward the clean energy technologies of the future.

Rep. Michael Honda, D-San Jose, is a member of the House Sustainable Energy and Environment Coalition. Actress Amy Smart serves on the boards of the Environmental Media Association and Heal the Bay.

This article appeared on page H – 3 of the San Francisco Chronicle

The price of oil has leapt to nearly $69 a barrel. Another spike may be on the way

The Economist
RISING oil prices, believes Ali al-Naimi, Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, may soon “take the wheels off an already derailed world economy”. On the face of things, this concern is absurd. The plunge of $115 in the price of oil from its peak last July to its nadir in December was the most precipitous the world has ever seen. Demand for oil is still falling, as the world economy atrophies. Rumours abound of traders hiring tankers to store their excess oil. Rich countries’ stocks cover 62 days’ consumption, the most since 1993 . The average over the past five years has been 52 days’ worth.

Nor are oil firms pumping nearly as much as they could. OPEC has announced three separate rounds of production cuts since September in a bid to steady prices. In all, it has vowed to trim its output by 4.2m barrels a day (b/d). That leaves them with as much as 6m b/d of spare capacity. Despite this growing glut, however, the price of oil has been rising steadily in recent weeks . On Wednesday May 20th it closed above $60 a barrel for the first time in more than six months. That marks an increase of more than 75% since February. The price of futures contracts suggests that energy traders see the price rising higher still in the coming months and years. (During the day on Friday it appeared to be nearing $62 a barrel.)

The explanation is simple. Oilmen are worried because they believe that many of the factors behind the record-breaking ascent last year remain in place. Much of the world’s “easy” oil has already been extracted, or is in the hands of nationalist governments that will not allow foreigners to exploit it. That leaves firms to hunt for new reserves in ever more inhospitable and inaccessible places, such as the deep waters off Africa or the frozen oceans of the Arctic. Such fields take a long time and a lot of expensive technology to develop. Worse, new discoveries tend to be smaller than in the past and to run dry faster.

So oil firms must work doubly hard to replace declining fields and to increase output. Yet the oil industry is short of equipment and manpower, thanks to underinvestment in the 1980s and 1990s, when prices were low. As soon as the world economy starts growing again, the theory runs, demand for oil will once again outstrip the industry’s ability to supply it. In other words, the global recession has only interrupted the “supercycle” of which many analysts used to speak, during which the normal boom-and-bust cycle of oil and other commodities would give way to a protracted period of high prices, as ever-growing demand from emerging markets swallowed everything the extractive industries could produce.

Oil bosses, OPEC ministers and anxious bankers all agree on what is needed to prevent this scenario becoming reality: lavish investment in the development of new fields and in exploration. Yet the reverse is happening. The oil industry is cutting its spending, bringing fewer new fields into production and exploring less. The International Energy Agency reckons that overall investment will drop by 15-20% this year.

In theory, this should not be happening. Big Western oil firms (“majors” in the industry jargon) claim that they continue to invest steadily throughout the cycle, irrespective of gyrations in price. Big fields, they argue, can take a decade or more to develop, and may then produce oil or gas for several decades more. The price of oil at the time the investment is approved is irrelevant; the important thing is to make sure projects will be profitable across a range of possible future prices. If anything, given that most oilmen expect prices to rise in the medium term, you would expect them to be increasing their investment, to capitalise on the good times to come. Nonetheless, the extreme volatility of prices over the past year must have made big firms more cautious about future investments.

Then there are the state-owned firms in oil-soaked countries. These companies control the overwhelming majority of the world’s oil. The better managed and funded of them plan to continue investing despite the downturn. Saudi Aramco, the world’s biggest oil producer, recently completed a five-year scheme to expand its production capacity from 10m b/d to 12.5m b/d, at a cost of $70 billion. But in Russia, the world’s second-biggest oil producer, output is falling largely because private capital has been scared off by a series of expropriations, while the state starves the firms it controls of sufficient cash for investment. And most oil-rich states, naturally enough, are happy to see the price rise. Many have become used to bumper revenues in recent years and have struggled to balance their budgets since the price slumped last year.

Falling costs within the industry will offset the impact of falling investment budgets to some extent. BP argues its slight cut in investment does not really represent a reduction, thanks to deflation. Yet many constraints on expansion remain. For one thing, the world still does not have as many experienced petroleum engineers and geologists as it needs, says Iain Manson of Korn/Ferry, a recruiting firm. He expects it to take a decade or more to overcome the shortage. Meanwhile, he says, wages in the oil industry are not falling by nearly as much as other costs.

Worse, there is little sign that governments are willing to grant oil companies easier access to the most promising territory for exploration. Iraq’s plans to sign big new contracts with foreign firms are years behind schedule, as is its new oil law. American sanctions continue to impede investment in Iran. The Nigerian government has been unable to quell the insurgency in the Niger delta, making it difficult for oil firms to operate there. Even in America, despite years of debate, most coastal waters and much of Alaska remain off-limits to drilling.

So when demand begins to revive, a sharp rise in prices is inevitable. That does not mean that a price spike is just around the corner, however. The speed with which it arrives will depend on the strength of the global recovery. For the moment, global consumption of oil continues to fall, despite the slight brightening of the economic outlook. At the recent OPEC powwow Mr al-Naimi, the Saudi oil minister, argued that a low oil price always sowed the seeds of a future price rise, since it led to underinvestment. The only question this time is how quickly the strain will emerge.

Join the The PeakOilWhen Initiative http://www.peakoilwhen.org/

start now a global priority shift

Taking over GM is an ultimate opportunity to start a global priority shift and developing, designing and building clean energy technologies and infrastructure. A GLOBAL PRIORITY SHIFT is a MUST. GM could survive and even prosper and we all gain from getting clean energy in place. Join the www.OilAway.org

.

FSLR today fell $1.23, or 0.7%, to $189.06.

Posted by Eric Savitz

First Solar (FSLR) announced in March that it will buy privately held OptiSolar’s project development business for $400 million in stock.

The company said the OptiSolar project pipeline includes a 550 MW AC solar development project under a power purchase agreement with Pacific Gas & Electric (PCG). First Solar said the pipeline also includes 1,300 MW AC in negotiation with Western region utilities for solar development projects, as well as “strategic land rights” for 136,000 acres – about 210 square miles – “with the potential to deploy up to 19 GW AC of utility-scale power projects.”

First Solar said the core development team which worked on the projects will join the company.

The company said the deal is expected to close in Q2.

However, today it was reported at the Los Angeles Times that  The U.S. Department of the Interior’s inspector general has begun an investigation of the First Solar (FSLR) acquisition of Opti-Solar, including  acquisition of Opti-Solar’s applications for strategic land rights to 136,000 acres of public land in San Bernardino, Riverside and Kern counties in California.

Actually, what First Solar originally announced was that the deal included the strategic land rights to that acreage. But according to the Times, official from the Bureau of Land Management say that Opti-Solar has only filed applications for the right to develop that land. Applications that had not yet been approved.

 

President Obama today announced over $467 million from the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act

President Obama today announced over $467 million from the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act to expand and accelerate the development, deployment, and use of geothermal and solar energy throughout the United States. The funding announced today represents a substantial down payment that will help the solar and geothermal industries overcome technical barriers, demonstrate new technologies, and provide support for clean energy jobs for years to come. Today’s announcement supports the Obama Administration’s strategy to increase American economic competiveness, while supporting jobs and moving toward a clean energy economy.

“We have a choice. We can remain the world’s leading importer of oil, or we can become the world’s leading exporter of clean energy,” said President Obama. “We can hand over the jobs of the future to our competitors, or we can confront what they have already recognized as the great opportunity of our time: the nation that leads the world in creating new sources of clean energy will be the nation that leads the 21st century global economy. That’s the nation I want America to be.”

“We have an ambitious agenda to put millions of people to work by investing in clean energy technology like solar and geothermal energy,” Energy Secretary Steven Chu said. “These technologies represent two pieces of a broad energy portfolio that will help us aggressively fight climate change and renew our position as a global leader in clean energy jobs.”

Geothermal Energy

Geothermal energy is a clean source of renewable energy that harnesses heat from the Earth for heating applications and electricity generation; geothermal plants can operate around the clock to provide significant uninterrupted “base load” electricity, or the minimum amount a power utility must provide to its customers.

The Recovery Act makes a $350 million new investment in this technology, dwarfing previous government commitments. Recovery Act funding will support projects in four crucial areas: geothermal demonstration projects; Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) research and development; innovative exploration techniques; and a National Geothermal Data System, Resource Assessment and Classification System.

Geothermal Demonstration Projects ($140 Million)

Funding will support demonstrations of cutting-edge technologies to advance geothermal energy in new geographic areas, as well as geothermal energy production from oil and natural gas fields, geopressured fields, and low to moderate temperature geothermal resources.

Enhanced Geothermal Systems Technology Research and Development ($80 Million)

Funding will support research of EGS technology to allow geothermal power generation across the country. Conventional geothermal energy systems must be located near easily-accessible geothermal water resources, limiting its nationwide use. EGS makes use of available heat resources through engineered reservoirs, which can then be tapped to produce electricity. While the long-term goal of EGS is to generate cost competitive clean electricity, enabling research and development is needed to demonstrate the technology’s readiness in the near-term.

Innovative Exploration Techniques ($100 Million)

Funding will support projects that include exploration, siting, drilling, and characterization of a series of exploration wells utilizing innovative exploration techniques. Exploration of geothermal energy resources can carry a high upfront risk. By investing in and validating innovative exploration technologies and methods, DOE can help reduce the level of upfront risk for the private sector, allowing for increased investment and discovery of new geothermal resources.

National Geothermal Data System, Resource Assessment, and Classification System ($30 Million)

The long-term success of geothermal energy technologies depends upon a detailed characterization of geothermal energy resources nationwide. In 2008, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) conducted an assessment of high temperature resource potential in the Western United States. To fully leverage new low-temperature, geopressured, co-production, and EGS technologies, DOE will support a nationwide assessment of geothermal resources, working through the USGS and other partners. Second, DOE will support the development of a nationwide data system to make resource data available to academia, researchers, and the private sector. Finally, DOE will support the development of a geothermal resource classification system for use in determining site potential.

Solar Energy

Solar energy is a rapidly expanding industry with a double-digit annual growth rate in the United States. DOE is focused on supporting the U.S. industry’s scaling up of manufacturing, production, and distribution so the technology can become cost competitive with conventional sources of energy. DOE will provide $117.6 million in Recovery Act funding to accelerate widespread commercialization of clean solar energy technologies across America. These activities will leverage partnerships that include DOE’s national laboratories, universities, local government, and the private sector, to strengthen the U.S. solar industry and make it a leader in international markets.

Photovoltaic Technology Development ($51.5 Million)

DOE will expand investment in advanced photovoltaic concepts and high impact technologies, with the aim of making solar energy cost-competitive with conventional sources of electricity and to strengthen the competitiveness and capabilities of domestic manufacturers.

Solar Energy Deployment ($40.5 Million)

Projects in this area will focus on non-technical barriers to solar energy deployment, including grid connection, market barriers to solar energy adoption in cities, and the shortage of trained solar energy installers. Combined with new technology development, these deployment activities will help clear the path for wider adoption of solar energy in residential, commercial, and municipal environments.

Concentrating Solar Power Research and Development ($25.6 Million)

This work will focus on improving the reliability of concentrating solar power technologies and enhancing the capabilities of DOE National Laboratories to provide test and evaluation support to the solar industry.

For information on these and other Funding Opportunities under the Recovery Act, visit the U.S. Department of Energy’s Recovery And Reinvestment Act page on Funding Opportunities.

Every dollar the federal government invests in R&D comes back in $4 in taxes on average over the entire life of the technology.”

– Walajalabad Sampath, Professor, CSU.

– Secretary Chu: President’s Energy Budget Creates Jobs, Restores America’s Scientific Leadership and Puts Nation on the Path to Energy Independence
May 07, 2009
U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu today detailed President Barack Obama’s $26.4 billion fiscal year (FY) 2010 budget request for the Department of Energy, highlighting the administration’s commitment to transformational discoveries, breakthrough science, and innovative technologies in the nation’s effort to secure reliable, clean, safe, and secure energy, create new jobs, and fight climate change. While the budget makes important investments in energy independence and job creation, it also cuts back on programs that don’t work as well or are no longer needed.
“The President’s budget for energy reflects his commitment to ending our dependence on foreign oil, restoring our scientific leadership, and putting Americans back to work through investments in a new green energy economy,” Secretary Chu said. “It also demonstrates his commitment to using taxpayer dollars wisely—cutting spending on programs we don’t need so we can make strategic investments in our economic future.”
The President’s FY10 budget complements $38.7 billion the Department of Energy will invest as part of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Specifically, the President’s FY10 budget:
• Cuts funding for programs that aren’t needed or aren’t as effective as other investments—like more than $200 million in oil and gas company research that the companies can and do fund on their own.
• Substantially expands the use of clean, renewable energy sources while improving energy transmission infrastructure.
• Supports the administration’s goal to develop a smart, strong and secure electricity grid.
• Helps restore America’s leadership in scientific research and innovation—including transformative science that can lead to a new generation of clean energy jobs.
• Makes significant investments in low-emissions plug-in and hybrid vehicles, nuclear energy, and clean coal technologies as part of the Obama Administration’s aggressive effort to reduce greenhouse gas production.
• Supports the ongoing security of our weapons stockpile, continued efforts at nuclear non-proliferation and ongoing environmental cleanup and legacy management as part of the Department’s long-term stewardship responsibilities.

China to start a comprehensive solar energy strategy and implementation plans

Currently the main use of solar energy in China is for heating water. PV is the main technology used in China for electricity generation – both in industrial and commercial applications. Total solar radiation reaching China land areas is estimated at 5×10²²J (equivalent to ~1700 billion tons of coal equivalent (TCE). The areas of Tibet and Qinghai receives that largest amounts of solar radiation, but many other areas receive relatively large amounts of solar radiation, among them: southern part of inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Hebei, Shandong, Liaoning, mid and south Yunnan, South Guangdong, south Fujian, east and west Hainan. PV is considered by the Chinese government as a royal route among the renewable energies, but they realize that it cannot be left to the markets alone. Hence, financial promotion and political regulations were announced. Unlike energy for transportation and heating, electricity generation is still very centralized in China, but the understanding of the need for decentralization is making progress. As a first step, the Chinese government has announced a plan to grant ~2.9USD/Watt-peak (!) for a cap of 20MW, while each project is above 50KW. This PV road map sets its priority on roof projects and PV curtains in large and midsize cities as well as off-grid solar PV. The Chinese believe that PV will eventually become commercially competitive with conventional power network. However, the full potential of PV will be achieved in energy-autonomous buildings rather than as add-on devices in the grid connected systems of current facilities.

Energy independence is first of all a matter of national security

The most exciting international renewable energy Conference is starting tomorrow in Eilat and will last until the end of the week. The conference scientific advisor, Amnon Samid, chairman of the AGS group, told us that besides presenting the state of the art in each sector of the renewable energy and the issues involved with integrating renewable energy into the Grid, the conference will deal with actual questions – like how will the economics of solar power change in the short and mid-term? how much has the financial crisis affected the solar sector – which companies are delaying expansion planes and laying off staff ? will the market for solar power be growing and how fast? Which countries lead manufacturing and installation of solar power? Should or could Israel be a major player in the solar power industry or in other power generation technologies? What new solar thermal and PV plants are in the pipeline and what impact might they have?

In addition to the participation of politicians and businessmen from around the world, the conference will also feature several of the country’s leading solar start-up firms, including GreenSun Energy, Verilite, Solaris Synergy, HelioFocus and Tigo Energy. GreenSun has developed a revolutionary CPV technology to produce high efficiency solar panels that reduce the price per watt of solar energy in half and expects that its technology will reduce the price well below $1 in the next year, while Verilite’s patent pending technology of flat mirror collectors and a passively cooled central linear cell array will deliver an unmatched combination of durability, simplicity and low cost. Solaris Synergy’s new proprietary technology, which integrates a number of innovative mechanical, optical and thermal solutions, is based on medium-concentration solar units with photovoltaic elements cooled by evaporation, dramatically decreasing the temperature of photovoltaic elements. More mature companies will also present, like HelioFocus, that is developing a unique solar thermal technology that is high efficiency and modular, which allows market penetration without extensive project finance, and Tigo Energy, that through the re-partitioning of traditional PV system electronics, has developed a Distributed Inverter System Solution which will immediately provide returns of 7-20% above today’s traditionally architected PV systems.

However, Samid emphasizes that as much as Israel enjoys much creativity and a lot of successful start ups, also in the field of renewable energy, by itself it could not lead to energy security and independence. Now that a new government will be established in Israel, it should take all necessary steps for diversification of energy sources which is essential to energy security and to low carbon energy path to release Israel from depending on fossil fuels. Samid is calling upon the government to establish a special Task Force with strict time table and a required national budget – for developing the required family of technologies for supplying all its electricity needs with no use of oil. This is a matter of national security, and should be dealt as such, emphasizes Samid. ‘Technology will enable us to say we can grow our economy and protect our environment and secure our existence at the same time’.