Category Archives: China

Candidates for the Board of the First multi-national Task Force for 100% Renewable Energy?

 www.OilAway.org,

The Board will be established at the Energy Summit in 2010: http://www.energysummit2010.com/

  [The Apollo/Manhattan Clean Energy project was first announced by Amnon Samid at the Eilot International Renewable Energy Conference in Feb 2009] 

Martin Hoffert‏
Department of Physics, New York University
Ken Caldeira
Carnegie Institution / Stanford University
John Katzenberger
Aspen Global Change Institute
David Archer
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago
Maurice Averner
Ames Research Center, NASA
Scott Barrett
School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
Gregory Benford
Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine
Baruch Blumberg (Nobel laureate)
Fox Chase Cancer Center / University of Pennsylvania
Paul Crutzen (Nobel laureate)
University of California (San Diego) / Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
William Fulkerson
Institute for a Secure and Sustainable Environment, University of Tennessee
Christopher Green
Department of Economics, McGill University
Susan Hassol
Climate Communication
Eric Hoffert
Versatility Inc.
Thomas Homer-Dixon
Trudeau Center for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Toronto
Feng Hsu
Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA
Mark Jacobson
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University
David Keith
Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy, University of Calgary
Geoffrey Landis
Glenn Research Center, NASA
Jane C. S. Long
hydrogeologist and geotechnical engineer
Michael MacCracken
Climate Institute, Washington, DC
John C. Mankins
Sunsat Energy Council / Managed Energy Technologies
Michael E. Mann
Earth System Science Center, Pennsylvania State University
Gregg Marland
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Mark Nelson
Institute of Ecotechnics, Santa Fe, NM
Darel Preble
Space Solar Power Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology
Gregory H. Rau
Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz
Steve Rayner
Said Business School, Oxford, UK
Kim Stanley Robinson
Author, “Forty Signs of Rain”
Gregory Dennis Sachs
Alternative Power Program, US Merchant Marine Academy
Thomas Schelling (Nobel laureate)
Department of Economics, University of Maryland
Michael Schlesinger
Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Steven E. Schwartz
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Department of Energy
John Turner
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Department of Energy
Tyler Volk
Department of Biology, New York University
Tom M. L. Wigley
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Steven C. Wofsy
School of Engineering and Applied Science / Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Harvard University
Lowell Wood
Hoover Institution / Stanford University

Dear ______,

Dear Member of Congress,

We the undersigned urge you to accelerate our transition to a clean energy economy with the ambition of an Apollo or Manhattan program, by dramatically increasing America’s investment in innovative new energy technologies and systems.

A wide range of policies aimed at increasing conservation, efficiency, and reducing emissions is vital, but carbon prices and regulations alone will not create new, clean and affordable energy systems soon enough or at the scale needed.

America should be ramping up to invest a minimum of $30 billion per year to develop, demonstrate, and stimulate the commercialization of a range of technologies and approaches that can provide affordable carbon-neutral energy and use that energy more wisely. This is less than half of what America already invests in military research and development.

The United States is in a unique position to take the lead in this research and development effort, but we must work with others. The world, including China, India and other developing nations, needs affordable clean technologies now to avoid the lock-in of massive carbon emissions from conventional coal plants.

Energy sources available today cannot provide enough power to drive economic growth without damaging our climate system. We cannot predict with confidence which energy technologies will win in a future marketplace. For this reason, we need a diverse and strategically selected portfolio of investments. Potential solutions need to be explored and tested with hardware. Because the taxpayer dollar should be invested wisely, a relatively open process should be established that will select and support research and development projects based on technical merits.

Public investment in clean energy will more than pay for itself, just as did the U.S. government investment in computer science and aerospace during the 1950s and ’60s. Much of our economic growth since World War II resulted from technological developments that were accelerated and incubated by public investment – the Internet being only one example. Particularly critical are technologies that can be commercialized in five to twenty-five years — too long for venture capital, too short for basic research. Private firms are not making — and cannot be expected to make – the necessary level of long-term investments in energy and energy infrastructure research and development.

The major problems confronting the nation and world require clean, secure, and affordable energy.

Sustained public investment now in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies will reduce climate risk, increase energy security, revitalize education, enhance our competitiveness, and strengthen the American economy.

Sincerely*,

 

The price of oil has leapt to nearly $69 a barrel. Another spike may be on the way

The Economist
RISING oil prices, believes Ali al-Naimi, Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, may soon “take the wheels off an already derailed world economy”. On the face of things, this concern is absurd. The plunge of $115 in the price of oil from its peak last July to its nadir in December was the most precipitous the world has ever seen. Demand for oil is still falling, as the world economy atrophies. Rumours abound of traders hiring tankers to store their excess oil. Rich countries’ stocks cover 62 days’ consumption, the most since 1993 . The average over the past five years has been 52 days’ worth.

Nor are oil firms pumping nearly as much as they could. OPEC has announced three separate rounds of production cuts since September in a bid to steady prices. In all, it has vowed to trim its output by 4.2m barrels a day (b/d). That leaves them with as much as 6m b/d of spare capacity. Despite this growing glut, however, the price of oil has been rising steadily in recent weeks . On Wednesday May 20th it closed above $60 a barrel for the first time in more than six months. That marks an increase of more than 75% since February. The price of futures contracts suggests that energy traders see the price rising higher still in the coming months and years. (During the day on Friday it appeared to be nearing $62 a barrel.)

The explanation is simple. Oilmen are worried because they believe that many of the factors behind the record-breaking ascent last year remain in place. Much of the world’s “easy” oil has already been extracted, or is in the hands of nationalist governments that will not allow foreigners to exploit it. That leaves firms to hunt for new reserves in ever more inhospitable and inaccessible places, such as the deep waters off Africa or the frozen oceans of the Arctic. Such fields take a long time and a lot of expensive technology to develop. Worse, new discoveries tend to be smaller than in the past and to run dry faster.

So oil firms must work doubly hard to replace declining fields and to increase output. Yet the oil industry is short of equipment and manpower, thanks to underinvestment in the 1980s and 1990s, when prices were low. As soon as the world economy starts growing again, the theory runs, demand for oil will once again outstrip the industry’s ability to supply it. In other words, the global recession has only interrupted the “supercycle” of which many analysts used to speak, during which the normal boom-and-bust cycle of oil and other commodities would give way to a protracted period of high prices, as ever-growing demand from emerging markets swallowed everything the extractive industries could produce.

Oil bosses, OPEC ministers and anxious bankers all agree on what is needed to prevent this scenario becoming reality: lavish investment in the development of new fields and in exploration. Yet the reverse is happening. The oil industry is cutting its spending, bringing fewer new fields into production and exploring less. The International Energy Agency reckons that overall investment will drop by 15-20% this year.

In theory, this should not be happening. Big Western oil firms (“majors” in the industry jargon) claim that they continue to invest steadily throughout the cycle, irrespective of gyrations in price. Big fields, they argue, can take a decade or more to develop, and may then produce oil or gas for several decades more. The price of oil at the time the investment is approved is irrelevant; the important thing is to make sure projects will be profitable across a range of possible future prices. If anything, given that most oilmen expect prices to rise in the medium term, you would expect them to be increasing their investment, to capitalise on the good times to come. Nonetheless, the extreme volatility of prices over the past year must have made big firms more cautious about future investments.

Then there are the state-owned firms in oil-soaked countries. These companies control the overwhelming majority of the world’s oil. The better managed and funded of them plan to continue investing despite the downturn. Saudi Aramco, the world’s biggest oil producer, recently completed a five-year scheme to expand its production capacity from 10m b/d to 12.5m b/d, at a cost of $70 billion. But in Russia, the world’s second-biggest oil producer, output is falling largely because private capital has been scared off by a series of expropriations, while the state starves the firms it controls of sufficient cash for investment. And most oil-rich states, naturally enough, are happy to see the price rise. Many have become used to bumper revenues in recent years and have struggled to balance their budgets since the price slumped last year.

Falling costs within the industry will offset the impact of falling investment budgets to some extent. BP argues its slight cut in investment does not really represent a reduction, thanks to deflation. Yet many constraints on expansion remain. For one thing, the world still does not have as many experienced petroleum engineers and geologists as it needs, says Iain Manson of Korn/Ferry, a recruiting firm. He expects it to take a decade or more to overcome the shortage. Meanwhile, he says, wages in the oil industry are not falling by nearly as much as other costs.

Worse, there is little sign that governments are willing to grant oil companies easier access to the most promising territory for exploration. Iraq’s plans to sign big new contracts with foreign firms are years behind schedule, as is its new oil law. American sanctions continue to impede investment in Iran. The Nigerian government has been unable to quell the insurgency in the Niger delta, making it difficult for oil firms to operate there. Even in America, despite years of debate, most coastal waters and much of Alaska remain off-limits to drilling.

So when demand begins to revive, a sharp rise in prices is inevitable. That does not mean that a price spike is just around the corner, however. The speed with which it arrives will depend on the strength of the global recovery. For the moment, global consumption of oil continues to fall, despite the slight brightening of the economic outlook. At the recent OPEC powwow Mr al-Naimi, the Saudi oil minister, argued that a low oil price always sowed the seeds of a future price rise, since it led to underinvestment. The only question this time is how quickly the strain will emerge.

Join the The PeakOilWhen Initiative http://www.peakoilwhen.org/

Right now, Yingli can produce solar electricity for RMB1.1 to 1.3/kwh, depending on weather conditions

Yingli spokesman Li Wei

Suntech Chairman Shi Zhengrong said China would achieve solar electricity costs as low as to RMB1/kwh by 2012. Yingli also are aiming to reduce the cost of solar power to RMB1/kwh by 2012.

In June 2008, Yingli Green won a 62-megawatt project in Portugal, the largest solar energy project in the world so far.

About 50 MW of installed solar capacity was added in China in 2008, more than double the 20 MW in 2007, but still a relatively small amount. According to some studies, the demand in China for new solar modules could be as high as 232 MW each year from now on until 2012. The government has announced plans to expand the installed capacity to 1,800 MW by 2020.

By way of comparison, 3,800 MW of solar capacity are estimated to have been installed in Germany in 2007.

Officials at Yingly denies the rumors that Yingli Green Energy and SDIC Huajing Power have submitted a joint bid to build a 10-MW solar power plant in Dunhuang in northwest China at a price as low as RMB0.69/kwh (US$0.1/kwh)….  .

start now a global priority shift

Taking over GM is an ultimate opportunity to start a global priority shift and developing, designing and building clean energy technologies and infrastructure. A GLOBAL PRIORITY SHIFT is a MUST. GM could survive and even prosper and we all gain from getting clean energy in place. Join the www.OilAway.org

.

Chinese ministry of Finance is assiting local solar companies

Solar companies in Changzhou may have a real advantage on competitors due to China’s national solar investment subsidy program, which is expected to commence this year, and local Jiangsu subsidy program, which is viewed as a model provincial incentive program to potentially compliment the national subsidies.

Fro more details: solar@ags-tech.com

Concentrated solar power could meet up to 7 percent of the world’s power needs by 2030 and fully one quarter by 2050

Concentrated solar power could meet up to 7 percent of the world’s power needs by 2030 and fully one quarter by 2050.

The 3rd joint report from Greenpeace International, the European Solar Thermal Electricity Association (ESTELA) and IEA SolarPACES since 2003. With every edition we have increased the projected market volume significantly, and it finally turned over a billion dollars in 2008, this amount could double in 2009. While we highlighted in our first joint report the huge market potential, we were able to move to another message in 2005 when we launched the second report in Egypt: “CSP is ready for take off!”.

We now are delighted to say “CSP has taken off”, is about to step out of the shadow of other renewable technologies and can establish itself as the third biggest player in the sustainable power generation industry. CSP does not compete against other renewable energies; it is an additional one that is now economically viable.

Fighting climate change is paramount as such it is essential that the power generation sector becomes virtually CO2 free as soon as possible. Greenpeace and the European Renewable Industry Council developed a joint global vision – the Energy [R]evolution scenario – which provides a practical blueprint for rapidly cutting energy-related CO2 emissions in order to help ensure that greenhouse gas emissions peak and then fall by 2015. This can be achieved while ensuring economies in China, India and other developing nations have access to the energy that they need in order to develop. CSP plays an important role in this concept.

The Global CSP Outlook 2009 goes actually one step further. While the moderate CSP market scenario is in line with the Energy [R]evolution scenario, the advanced scenario shows that this technology has even more to offer. Globally, the CSP industry could employ as many as 2 million people by 2050 who will help save the climate and produce up to one quarter of the world’s electricity. This is a truly inspiring vision. Especially as this technology has developed it’s very own striking beauty – the stunning pictures in this report show that saving the climate look spectacular.

 

 

Chinese solar firms pledge US¢15/kWh cost by 2012

Xinhua Economic News (21 MAY 2009)

BEIJING, May 21, 2009 (Xinhua via COMTEX) — Major solar cell makers in China have recently signed a joint statement, pledging to cut the PV power generation cost by 2012 to one yuan/kWh, a critical point believed by most industry experts that may trigger off the large-scaled application of solar PV system in the country.

A total of 13 solar cell makers including Suntech Power (STP.NYSE), Yingli Green Energy (YGE.NYSE), JA Solar (JASO.NASDAQ), LDK Solar (LDK.NYSE), SINO-SI, GCL Silicon, Xinguang Silicon, Emei Semiconductor Materials Plant, Jiangsu Sunda, endorsed the statement in the annual solar PV industry conference held in Luoyang.

The drastic fall in the polysilicon price and the fast localization of the PV industry chain have made it possible to slash the PV solar power generation cost to one yuan/kWh by 2012, said a solar firm executive.

Polysilicon, the major raw material of solar cell, had made up about 70 percent of PV solar cell cost before October 2008, when it was priced at as high as more than 400 US dollars/kg. The proportion fell to less than 40 percent in early April when its price plunged to less than 100 US dollars/kg.

Industry insiders predict that the polysilicon price will further drop because the production cost in China is about 50 US dollars/kg, and the production capacity has been in excess.

Now Chinese solar enterprises hope to awake the huge potential demand for solar batteries in the domestic market through joint effort to lower the PV power generation cost. Chinese PV solar cell market hasn’t been triggered off on a large scale, which has been the weakest link of China’s PV industry and is also the link for the biggest price fall.

China’s current PV power generation cost is about 1.5 yuan/kWh on average according to the latest bidding for the 10 MW solar power plant in Dunhuang, Gansu.

China to start a comprehensive solar energy strategy and implementation plans

Currently the main use of solar energy in China is for heating water. PV is the main technology used in China for electricity generation – both in industrial and commercial applications. Total solar radiation reaching China land areas is estimated at 5×10²²J (equivalent to ~1700 billion tons of coal equivalent (TCE). The areas of Tibet and Qinghai receives that largest amounts of solar radiation, but many other areas receive relatively large amounts of solar radiation, among them: southern part of inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Hebei, Shandong, Liaoning, mid and south Yunnan, South Guangdong, south Fujian, east and west Hainan. PV is considered by the Chinese government as a royal route among the renewable energies, but they realize that it cannot be left to the markets alone. Hence, financial promotion and political regulations were announced. Unlike energy for transportation and heating, electricity generation is still very centralized in China, but the understanding of the need for decentralization is making progress. As a first step, the Chinese government has announced a plan to grant ~2.9USD/Watt-peak (!) for a cap of 20MW, while each project is above 50KW. This PV road map sets its priority on roof projects and PV curtains in large and midsize cities as well as off-grid solar PV. The Chinese believe that PV will eventually become commercially competitive with conventional power network. However, the full potential of PV will be achieved in energy-autonomous buildings rather than as add-on devices in the grid connected systems of current facilities.

China’s biggest PV project seeks operator

DUNHUANG, Feb 23, 2009 (SinoCast Daily Business Beat via COMTEX) — China’s largest photovoltaic power generation project is seeking for builder and operator now and the tender is near close, said the National Energy Administration, the bidding holder. China plans to build up a large PV power generation farm in Dunhuang, Gansu Province in Northwest China, covering a plot of land of 1 million square meters and involving total investment about USD 75 million. It is designed to have installed capacity of 10 megawatts and could generate electricity of 16.37 million KWH annually. The project is a landmark of China’s PV power generation industry. The top five independent power generation giants and leading PV application companies in China, as well as several foreign companies, have given their offers to it. The winner that will be announced on March 20, 2009 should complete the construction in 18 months and gain a license to operate it for 25 years. Given that silicon price is plunging now, the PV products that will be widely used in this project will cost less. The bidding holder expects the winning offer to be below 30 US cent per KWH of electricity the project generates and sells.

Energy independence is first of all a matter of national security

The most exciting international renewable energy Conference is starting tomorrow in Eilat and will last until the end of the week. The conference scientific advisor, Amnon Samid, chairman of the AGS group, told us that besides presenting the state of the art in each sector of the renewable energy and the issues involved with integrating renewable energy into the Grid, the conference will deal with actual questions – like how will the economics of solar power change in the short and mid-term? how much has the financial crisis affected the solar sector – which companies are delaying expansion planes and laying off staff ? will the market for solar power be growing and how fast? Which countries lead manufacturing and installation of solar power? Should or could Israel be a major player in the solar power industry or in other power generation technologies? What new solar thermal and PV plants are in the pipeline and what impact might they have?

In addition to the participation of politicians and businessmen from around the world, the conference will also feature several of the country’s leading solar start-up firms, including GreenSun Energy, Verilite, Solaris Synergy, HelioFocus and Tigo Energy. GreenSun has developed a revolutionary CPV technology to produce high efficiency solar panels that reduce the price per watt of solar energy in half and expects that its technology will reduce the price well below $1 in the next year, while Verilite’s patent pending technology of flat mirror collectors and a passively cooled central linear cell array will deliver an unmatched combination of durability, simplicity and low cost. Solaris Synergy’s new proprietary technology, which integrates a number of innovative mechanical, optical and thermal solutions, is based on medium-concentration solar units with photovoltaic elements cooled by evaporation, dramatically decreasing the temperature of photovoltaic elements. More mature companies will also present, like HelioFocus, that is developing a unique solar thermal technology that is high efficiency and modular, which allows market penetration without extensive project finance, and Tigo Energy, that through the re-partitioning of traditional PV system electronics, has developed a Distributed Inverter System Solution which will immediately provide returns of 7-20% above today’s traditionally architected PV systems.

However, Samid emphasizes that as much as Israel enjoys much creativity and a lot of successful start ups, also in the field of renewable energy, by itself it could not lead to energy security and independence. Now that a new government will be established in Israel, it should take all necessary steps for diversification of energy sources which is essential to energy security and to low carbon energy path to release Israel from depending on fossil fuels. Samid is calling upon the government to establish a special Task Force with strict time table and a required national budget – for developing the required family of technologies for supplying all its electricity needs with no use of oil. This is a matter of national security, and should be dealt as such, emphasizes Samid. ‘Technology will enable us to say we can grow our economy and protect our environment and secure our existence at the same time’.